December 18, 2002

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Mindles H. Dreck:

Flexible Criticism

'Theodore Dalrymple' decries the rise of violent crime in Britain in the Wall Street Journal:

Britain is now the world leader in very little, with the single possible exception of crime.

Recent figures published by the U.N. show that Britain is now among the most crime-ridden countries in the world: Its citizens are much more likely to be attacked or robbed on the street, or have their houses burgled, than their counterparts in, say, Russia or South Africa, let alone the U.S. Everyday experience in Britain is quite sufficient to establish that we now live in a deeply criminalized society.

He goes on to describe the problem in terms that have a certain...universal ring, I think:

In the war against civility, the savages have it all their own way....

...The response of the British liberal intelligentsia and the political class to the crime wave that has engulfed our society makes a jellyfish look solid. Witness the British middle class in full retreat. Every conceivable argument has been used to avoid acknowledging the painful reality of what we have so heedlessly wrought over so short a period. Some try to suggest that crime hasn't really increased, but that it is just more fully reported now than ever before. Others venture that there is more theft because people have more possessions (the first time wealth rather than poverty has been blamed for crime). And so on, ad infinitum.

As the politicians dither and bicker, I am reminded of the Romanian peasant proverb: The whole village is on fire, but grandmother wants to finish combing her hair.

At the root of the British inability to confront the problem is snobbery. There is a reluctance on the part of the upper echelons of society to believe that the lower echelons are fully human, and therefore responsible for their own acts and decisions. No discussion with a British liberal about the growing incivility, criminality and violence of British life is complete without reference to Hogarth's Gin Lane, the implication being that 'twas ever thus. This, of course, is nonsense. But it does establish that the British liberal intelligentsia believes the lower classes are genetically and irredeemably, utter scum.


To coin a phrase, indeed.

Posted by Mindles H. Dreck at December 18, 2002 2:30 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

If you treat people like utter scum, they are likely to live down to your expectations. That's been quite well proven in education, and I would be surprised if it was different in other areas.

Posted by: markm on December 18, 2002 6:22 PM

Just a quick "heads-up": Theodore Dalrymple is usually the author of a column entitled "A Doctor Writes", and probably shouldn't be relied upon for criminology.

He is also often quite comprehensiely barking.

Posted by: dsquared on December 19, 2002 2:42 AM

Theodore has been writing a Spectator column for 5 years or so, and is a damn sight better informed on criminology than you are, as he is a prison doctor and GP in a UK inner city.

Posted by: Kevin Marks on December 19, 2002 5:05 AM

He's also wrong on the South Africa thing. The assault rate's about the same, but you're much more likely to be robbed or burgled in the rainbow democracy.

Posted by: Iain Murray on December 19, 2002 4:38 PM

Comments are Closed.