The American Mind has this completely idiotic quote from some well meaning fool in the heartland:
I don't think we respond to the horrors of Sept. 11 with more violence. [T]hen Osama Bin Laden has already won.
And to think I almost fell for the idea ...
Well, I know better now. The next time a terrorist kills thousands of people, I won't respond for fear that he'll "win".
Heinlein pretty well answered this in Starship Trooper.
Too bad this guy learned all his tactics from Star Wars. ...Anger leads to hate, hate leads to the Dark Side etc.
As Christopher Hitchens said: "They want to be martyrs for their faith. We'll be happy to help them out."
Funny thing about Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, etc. is that the underlying message is to pursue peace, but fight to maintain order when necessary. Amazingly, many people who guide themselves by such thinking never master the second half of that philosophy.
No they haven't forgotten it Mouse, its just that it is *their* order that they'll fight to perserve, not anyone elses.
The study of came theory needs to land somewhere in this mix...Well, in someone's mix.
Um... read for context please. The quote is about the death penalty; it has nothing to do with Bin Laden, other than as an amazingly stupid invocation of Our Sacred Dead.
"Thirty-eight states now have it. It begs the question: Why not Wisconsin?"
John Huebscher, executive director of the Wisconsin Catholic Conference, responded to Lasee's question by saying the threat of terrorism is no reason to establish the death penalty.
"I don't think we respond to the horrors of Sept. 11 with more violence," Huebscher said. If a death penalty becomes new law, he said, "then Osama Bin Laden has already won."
Now Leonard-- If we read the quote FOR CONTEXT, then the terrorists will have won. I liked the quote so much better BEFORE you had to go and put it in context! You're like-- a big grinch.
I'm beginning to notice a trend in this site.
Since I posted on the quote, let me remind everyone that what the quote strates is the banality employed by people to advance their agenda. Everything used to be "for the children." Now it's do "blank" or "the ists will have one." Little thought is used. Instead, the speaker relies solely on emotion.
> Everything used to be "for the children." Now it's do "blank" or "the ists will have one." Little thought is used. Instead, the speaker relies solely on emotion.
I don't think that it's actually an appeal to emotion. The usage is more like that of a magic spell in that the expectation is that the listener will be unable to do anything except comply and that all opponents will be revealed as knaves.
Interestingly enough, it's often used by folks who clearly don't believe in magic.
Comments are Closed.