January 27, 2003

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

One of the nice things about being me is that I get all these mass political emails. I just got one from the Democrats headlined "What do YOU think the State of the Union is?".

I'm so glad to be able to help out my Democratic friends. Personally, I think your party should have told you about it sooner, certainly before they spring a pop-quiz on you. But I suppose that's an internal manner you'll have to deal with. Anyway, here's the answer:

The State of the Union is an address, given by American presidents per the Constitution, at Article II, Section 3. Woodrow Wilson instituted the modern practice of delivering it to congress in person. It takes place in late January. In this address, the president lays out the major issues and achievements of the nation for the past twelve months, and outlines any plans he may have for addressing major areas of concern.

Now when you get the quiz, you'll at least have the first answer in your pocket. No, don't thank me. I'm a giver.

Posted by Jane Galt at January 27, 2003 9:04 AM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

BWAH!!!!!!!

Posted by: Dave on January 27, 2003 9:25 AM

And if they push you for more details, you can tell them that the requirement for a state of the union address is in the Constitution, at Article II, Section 3.

You're welcome.


BR,
Fritz/f

Posted by: Fritz Schranck on January 27, 2003 10:39 AM

Where'd you get Lincoln from? The president is required to deliver a message on the state of the Union to congress, but Jefferson discontinued the practice of delivering it in person. (He thought it inappropriate). Teddy Roosevelt revived the practice of an actual address (he couldn't pass up the chance to be the certer of attention), which has been followed ever since. Lincoln never delivered a SOTU address...

Posted by: jimbo on January 27, 2003 11:18 AM

Ooops - a quick google tells me it was Wilson, not Roosevelt, who revived it. I guess I was confusing him with FDR, who was the first to refer to it as the "State of the Union Speech".

http://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/history.html

Posted by: jimbo on January 27, 2003 11:39 AM

Yeah, but note the wishy-washy "outcomes-based education" method of the question. What do YOU THINK the State of the Union is.

Therefore, no answer is incorrect, there are simply some that are "more right" than others!

Posted by: Bob on January 27, 2003 11:39 AM

My bad -- at some point I learned that Lincoln was the first to give it. Will correct.

Posted by: Jane Galt on January 27, 2003 12:08 PM

This explanation would have been even funnier if Leslie Nielsen had read it aloud and concluded, "But that's not important right now."

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on January 27, 2003 12:14 PM

What is the point of deliberately misconstruing a question?

Posted by: Orbitron on January 27, 2003 12:24 PM

It's a joke. Jokes are things we humans tell each other in order to produce a spastic contraction of the diaphragm and facial muscles known as a "laugh". Often, when a turn of phrase has an ambiguous meaning that strikes us as funny, we will deliberately misconstrue it in order to provoke this reaction in others.

Posted by: Jane Galt on January 27, 2003 12:28 PM

Was the original question ambiguous?

Posted by: Orbitron on January 27, 2003 12:35 PM

Ambigous or not, the sentence is a question only in the sense that it ends with a '?'. In the context described by Megan it is so laugh-(see definition above)-ably biased that the urge to play some word games with it is almost uncontrollable.

Posted by: Chris on January 27, 2003 1:20 PM

IMO this just goes to show the importance of the straight line in comedy. Without a good setup you just don't have a joke.

Posted by: Orbitron on January 27, 2003 1:38 PM

Yes, in the sense that it could have two meanings: "What do you think the state of the union is?" (how do you think America's doing?) or "What do you think the State of the Union is?" (What is the State of the Union address?)

Posted by: Jane Galt on January 27, 2003 1:39 PM

There's an old saying, Jane--"Everybody likes a piece of, but nobody likes a smart..."

I suspect it goes double for clueless Dems.

Posted by: Rand Simberg on January 27, 2003 2:07 PM

Thanks for the giggle--especially the closer... "No, don't thank me. I'm a giver."

Posted by: Leigh-Anne on January 27, 2003 2:25 PM

I just don't think any reasonable person (even a character in _Airplane!_) would interpret the question "What do YOU think the State of the Union is?" to mean "What is the State of the Union Address?" Too big a stretch.

Wrt "biased" (Chris). A message sent from the Democratic Party as such is going to be partisan. By definition.

Posted by: Orbitron on January 27, 2003 2:36 PM

"What do you think the State of the Union is?"

Correct me if I'm wrong (my grammar is awful, too), but isn't the question grammatically incorrect? You shouldn't end a sentence with a preposition.

The Democrats should have said, "What do you think the State of the Union is, you worthless, unthinking prole?"

Posted by: Jeff Wimble on January 27, 2003 3:08 PM

It was a joke, Orbitron. You're taking this waaaaaaay too seriously. It's not a commentary on anything except a turn of phrase that struck me funny. If you didn't find it funny, that's fine, but there's no need to call out the post police.

Actually, is is a verb, not a preposition, and it's perfectly grammatical to end a question with an implied predicate nominative. (How's that for erudite? Hmmm? Impressed yet?)

Posted by: Jane Galt on January 27, 2003 3:25 PM

Jeff, I think you're right. It should be phrased, "The State of the Union! What is it?" THEN insert the Jane Galt-as-Leslie Nielsen response with Paul's tag, "but that's not important right now." Funny, funny, stuff.

Posted by: Jeff Utech on January 27, 2003 3:51 PM

[closer gag]

I don't get it.

[/closer gag]

Posted by: Michael Ubaldi on January 27, 2003 3:54 PM

"Is" is not a preposition. (Insert obligatory Monty Python quote here...)

And anyway, that whole rule about not ending a sentence in a preposition is just for obsessive grammer nerds. As Churchill was said to have replied to someone who called him on it: "This is the sort of officious nonsense up with which I will not put!"

Posted by: jimbo on January 27, 2003 4:08 PM

And anyway, that whole rule about not ending a sentence in a preposition is just for obsessive grammer nerds.

That is a grammatical principle without which I could not do.

Posted by: Michael Ubaldi on January 27, 2003 4:17 PM

It's not a joke. It's a put down. And a fairly nasty one as well. But delivered with the smile that mean intellectuals seem to prefer.

Posted by: John Galt on January 27, 2003 7:57 PM

Heavens! You people obviously don't have enough to do!

Posted by: Bob on January 28, 2003 12:32 AM

Heavens! You people obviously don't have enough to do!

Posted by: Bob on January 28, 2003 12:33 AM

Heavens! Bob obviously has more than enough to do...like hit that "POST" button twice!

Posted by: Xenophon on January 28, 2003 3:02 AM

"Sometimes a preposition is the only thing you can end a sentence with." -- Andy Rooney

Posted by: Paul Snively on January 28, 2003 3:19 PM

There's an old saying, Jane--"Everybody likes a piece of, but nobody likes a smart..."


Id' rather be a smarta$$ than a dumba$$.

Posted by: Mike W on January 28, 2003 4:55 PM

Orbitron

Sorry...couldn't resist.

Posted by: Steve on January 29, 2003 1:47 AM

Comments are Closed.