From the New York Times:
ITH MET ALPHA, in Baghdad, Iraq, April 23 — American-led forces have occupied a vast warehouse complex in Baghdad filled with chemicals where Iraqi scientists are suspected of having tested unconventional agents on dogs within the past year, according to military officers and weapons experts.Posted by Jane Galt at April 24, 2003 1:54 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links
I never thought I'd be reading about "man on dog" on this blog!
Seriously, "suspected"? Can we declare a moratorium on suspecting Iraqis of doing anything, now that we've been hopelessly proven incompetent and wrong in our intelligence analysis?
I have a hard time getting excited.
I mean, I can get excited about chemical weapons. But testing them on dogs?
Sure, its distasteful. But who is going to make weapons without testing them? I'm sure that if we make them here in the U.S., we test them too. Maybe on primates for all I know.
So, yes, newsflash: chemical weapons = icky.
Googler: After reading of the liberation of a (completely unexpected) children's prison full of toddlers, the answer to your question is "No."
I thought PETA stood for "peopl eating tasty animals",you lead us on and then did not produce a recipe, shame on you!
Just because PETA's vegetarian agenda is allowed to exist doesn't make any difference: The meat industries are still going to kill just as many animals for my stomach. Thanks for letting food go to waste, assholes.
Just because PETA's vegetarian agenda is allowed to exist doesn't make any difference: The meat industries are still going to kill just as many animals for my stomach. Thanks for letting food go to waste, assholes.
Comments are Closed.