April 19, 2004

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Three cheers for democracy

Anyone who's been arguing that Arab/Islamic/war-torn countries just can't do democracy just got a massive dose of disconfirming evidence: Algeria, which is only slowly emerging from a horrifying civil war, just re-elected its president (who came to power in 1999 when the other six candidates resigned before the election to protest massive fraud) in a clean election. Democratic institutions certainly aren't easy to build -- but they're not the impossibility many of the critics seem to think.

Posted by Jane Galt at April 19, 2004 6:49 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links
Comments
Posted by: James B. Shearer on April 19, 2004 7:15 PM

I would be more impressed if the president had lost the election and then surrendered power peaceably.

Also I believe as in Iran only candidates acceptable to the ruling clique are allowed to run.

Where does Algeria rank on those lists of how free countries are?

Posted by: Tom on April 19, 2004 7:17 PM

Of course, earlier in Algeria's history, the second round of the January 1992 elections were cancelled by the military when it became obvious the Islamic party would win.

Posted by: SomeCallMeTim on April 19, 2004 7:52 PM

Great if it continues, but since we just helped J.B. Aristide (only the second democratically elected president of Haiti) flee his country, you might not want to put too much weight on Algeria as proof of concept.

By the way, when did Republicans become naive and Dems cold-eyed realists? Was there a memo?

Posted by: Brian on April 19, 2004 8:06 PM

"There is only one cure for the evils which newly acquired freedom produces; and that cure is freedom. When a prisoner first leaves his cell he cannot bear the light of day: he is unable to discriminate colors, or recognize faces. But the remedy is not to remand him into his dungeon, but to accustom him to the rays of the sun. The blaze of truth and liberty may at first dazzle and bewilder nations which have become half blind in the house of bondage. But let them gaze on, and they will soon be able to bear it.... Many politicians of our time are in the habit of laying down as a self-evident proposition, that no people ought to be free till they are fit to use their freedom. The maxim is worthy of the fool in the old story who resolved not to go into the water till he had learnt to swim. If men are to wait for liberty till they become wise and good in slavery, they may indeed wait for ever."

We classical liberal types should read more Macaulay.

Posted by: james on April 20, 2004 12:14 AM

Also, the govt spent the last decade fighting an UNCOMPRIMISING AND UNYIELDING battle against the Islamists who tried to hijack the original elections. I remember the left at the time in an uproar..."military dictatorship going against the will of the people, blah blah". to

Posted by: James R. Rummel on April 20, 2004 2:23 AM

"Great if it continues, but since we just helped J.B. Aristide (only the second democratically elected president of Haiti) flee his country, you might not want to put too much weight on Algeria as proof of concept."

Haiti is Islamic? Must have missed that memo.

Sure, Haiti has had a simmering brushfire conflict off and on for some time. But I'm not ready to label it as "war torn" just yet.

James

Posted by: James B. Shearer on April 20, 2004 1:03 PM

james, I think "tried to hijack" should read "won".

Posted by: maor on April 21, 2004 11:22 AM

I have recently seen Mauritania ranked as the most democratic Arab country.
Second place was Somalia, of all places.

Posted by: Jane Galt on April 21, 2004 11:53 AM

Algeria is certainly not what I would call all the way there. My point was rather that a country that suffered a military coup ten years ago, and election fraud only five years ago, has now had a transparent election, even as government repression has eased. That's a pretty big step. My commenters are, of course, correct that the real test will be when the ruling party loses. Still, it's a good sign. Remember, Chile had Pinochet not that long ago -- and not long after that, people were arguing that Latin America was just culturally unsuited to Democracy, can't happen there, no way, no how . . . those little brown people just don't value freedom the way we do. Democracy is happening in Latin America, and I firmly believe it can happen other places. When you think of how few people were living in any sort of democracy in 1945, we've really come an amazingly long way. A little more patience is in order.

Comments are Closed.