Minnesota turned in a faithless elector -- for the Democrats. Someone wrote in John Edwards" instead of John Kerry, but no one will now 'fess up to having done it.
Posted by Jane Galt at December 15, 2004 2:38 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound linksWell the electors that were called upon were Democrats. Who would have thunk one of them would have a hard time voting.
Faithless?... from the stories I've read a better adjective would be 'clueless'. Especially since none want to 'fess up to it. Most 'faithless electors' seem to view their action as some form of protest and are proud of it.
After four years the dems still haven't figured out how to fill out a presidental ballot correctly.
The stories that I saw said that the elector did not vote for "John Edwards', but for "John Ewards". Myabe that's why the faithless elector didn't admit the deed.
Comments are Closed.