April 17, 2005

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Reading comprehension

Can you spot the error in this Foreign Affairs article?

By contrast, U.S. mobile-phone policy was born of a colossal blunder from which the industry has yet to recover fully. In the early 1980s, after the management consultancy McKinsey estimated that there would be little demand for mobile phones and a small prospect of profitability, the FCC carved the United States into 734 tiny mobile-phone districts. It handed out two provider licenses in each district: one automatically went to the regional telephone company, and the other was drawn by lottery. The resulting infrastructure was cripplingly fragmented. It could not support nationwide calls, and inefficiencies and expensive connection rates translated into sky-high charges for customers.

Twenty years later, the Clinton administration made a belated effort to encourage nationwide cellular networks. The government opened up enough spectrum for six nationwide networks and invited bids. Thanks to an imaginative on-line auction, it had sold off the spectrum for $7.7 billion by early 1995. Although the networks that entered the market still struggle to offer consistent quality, competition among them sharply reduced the price of mobile-phone service and spawned millions of new customers.

Click below for the answer.

Let's not always see the same hands . . . yes, that's right, twenty years later than "the early 1980's", the Clinton administration had come and gone.

Posted by Jane Galt at April 17, 2005 3:23 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links
Comments
Posted by: Dave on April 17, 2005 4:27 PM

Too many errors to pick just one...

"could not support nationwide calls" - sure could, we called it long-distance back in those days.

If he means that phones couldn't make calls when you traveled, he's still wrong - we called that roaming.


The full article just gets worse.

Posted by: DF on April 17, 2005 4:48 PM

It would be interesting to learn what Mr. Bleha thought circa 1990 about the relative prospects for the US and Japanese economies over the coming decade.

Comments are Closed.