June 15, 2005

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Mindles H. Dreck:

Emergent Stupidity at the NYSE

I recommend this article by Kim Strassel on the Webb Report and the behind-the-scenes story of Dick Grasso's fat pay package at the NYSE.

Strassel's article takes a detailed look at board involvement, and lack thereof, in approving this package. It's a fascinating look at the problems with honorific board membership, in this case Madeleine Albright and Carl McCall, and the emergent stupidity of groups.

The board, which was often dysfunctional, was stocked with celebrities from diverse constituencies, many of whom didn't understand the NYSE or take their responsibilities seriously. Former New York State Comptroller Carl McCall, who brought Mr. Grasso's contract to fruition, was viewed by his colleagues as incompetent and, in the words of Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson, not "financially sophisticated." Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright felt she shouldn't "question" the pay; Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne admitted he "tuned out" of the pay proceedings; and Van der Moolen Vice Chairman Robert Fagenson suggested the only real concern was "how this was going to reflect on the Board."

But the interviews also make clear that more astute board members, such as Mr. Langone, former Viacom President Mel Karmazin, and former Merrill Lynch Chairman David Komansky, took it upon themselves to understand Mr. Grasso's contract, and offered strong arguments for why they'd paid him as they had. "We knew what we were doing when we paid him. We did it purposely, and we believed it was the right compensation," Mr. Komansky said in his interview.

......Former Morgan Stanley chief Mr. Fisher noted "that many directors 'couldn't tell a stock from a bond' and were only on the Board because they represented particular constituencies." As a result, the board was rife with personal antagonistic agendas. Mr. Cayne referred to Ms. Albright as "unbelievably irritating." Mr. Levin told investigators that some of Mr. Schrempp's actions were designed simply to "cover his ass." And independent floor broker James Duryea suggested that the banks with electronic networks competing with the Big Board could "benefit from discord," and may have seized the moment to "do away with Grasso." *


In other words, it was a part-time dalliance for a big group of notables and, miracle of miracles, their individual effectiveness did not add up to a well-oiled machine. As I said, emergent stupidity.

More later.

*Actually, the rumour on the street has consistently been that specialists outed Grasso's pay package to derail disciplinary actions. This isn't entirely inconsistent with Duryea's suggestion, however.

Posted by Mindles H. Dreck at June 15, 2005 6:09 AM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

"Mr. Cayne referred to Ms. Albright as "unbelievably irritating."

Who knew?

Posted by: AllenS on June 15, 2005 7:52 AM

My very thought!

Beyond that, I give credit to Komansky and the others who were paying attention for being willing to stick by their actions, regardless of my agreement or disagreement with those actions. How novel, to hear someone involved in a controversial decision take responsibility for that decision and not try to plead extenuation or point fingers.

Posted by: Jamie on June 15, 2005 8:24 AM

C'mon now. I'm willing to accept that in the best “Wisdom of Crowds” sense the decisions reached by the board were better than the decisions that any of the individuals involved would have arrived at on their own. Of course, it doesn't say much about the individuals…

Posted by: Dave Schuler on June 15, 2005 8:50 AM

Im not buying the idea a bunch of stupid people working together will outperform one smart(and handsome) person. Every once in a while a bunch of blithering idiots get lucky and do something well. Sometimes its not luck, it's just shocking treachery and hatefulness, some method straight out of Roves political necromicron. It's much easier to believe a single fool can be put in a high place by evil, evil, rich people- see jr and the current rep party, then a group of admittedly stupid, at the very least not sophisticated or even clever people, of coming to the right decision of what to pay some CEO.

Hive behavior by insects is certainly interesting. I think the somewhat famous flatworm experiment is more interesting. Scientists "taught" a group of flatworms a maze, and recorded how long it took them to "learn" their way through. They then took that group of flatworms, ran them through a grinder, and fed those flatworms to another group of flatworms that never had been in the maze. The group of flatworms that ate their family learned the maze about 20 times faster then the original group or subsequent control groups. I hate to think what the world would come to if we thought it was valid to use this sort of insect biology and behavior in order to find a method to change human behavior.

Posted by: ether christ superstar on June 15, 2005 10:17 AM

So if you take everyone who's been in Congress more than 12 years and grind up all their brains together...

You get a heap of stuff you wouldn't want to feed to even a flatworm, but the next Congress is bound to be an improvement.

Posted by: markm on June 15, 2005 11:42 AM

"Former New York State Comptroller Carl McCall, who brought Mr. Grasso's contract to fruition, was viewed by his colleagues as incompetent and, in the words of Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson, not 'financially sophisticated.'"

C'mon, he was Comptroller of the State of New York, for crying out loud.

After the briefest look at the state's finances and pension committments someone has to tell you he was incompetent and not financially sophisticated?

Fortunately for the citizenry he was just as incompetent at running his campaign for governor. In a state that is 3 to 2 Demcoratic, for a while there it looked like he was going to come in third.

But he's paid his dues so the Democrats will find a job for him -- put him on a commission drafting National Health Care reforms or some such.

Posted by: Jim Glass on June 15, 2005 12:49 PM

From my own observation, which is, of course, totally unscientific, a group of smart people working together is quite often far less than the sum of its parts. The marginal contribution is never equal to one person.

Posted by: AT on June 15, 2005 10:34 PM

I read somewhere that, disappointingly, the flatworm experiment has been debunked. Apparently the original experimenters did not clean the maze, and subsequent groups of flatworms were following trails left by their predecessors.

Posted by: purple on June 16, 2005 10:38 AM

'in this case Madeleine Albright and Carl McCall'

Can there be any situation in which those two were involved that could ever have a successful outcome? Whenever I see her all I can think of is Margaret Dumont on the Three Stooges.

Posted by: Jack Tanner on June 16, 2005 11:21 AM

Former New York State Comptroller Carl McCall, who brought Mr. Grasso's contract to fruition, was viewed by his colleagues as incompetent and, in the words of Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson, not "financially sophisticated."

As far as I'm concerned, Grasso's compensation is between him and the NYSE, anyway. It strikes me as far more disturbing (and far more worthy of media attention) that someone so apparently incompetent was running the finances of New York than that he helped to overpay Grasso.

Posted by: JSinger on June 16, 2005 2:23 PM

Jack --

Margaret Dumont often played the dowager with the Marx Bros., while it was Symona Boniface who filled that role with the Three Stooges.

Posted by: Johnathan R. on June 16, 2005 3:19 PM

AT--

That is certainly the way it is in most committees, where everyone else thinks someone else is taking care of the details, they have better things to do. But (usually voluntary) collaborations among people who know or can do different things that are all needed can accomplish wonders. Some of the best things I've accomplished were in small groups, where none of us could have done it ourselves.

Posted by: Bob M on June 17, 2005 8:29 AM

As usual, Despair, Inc. has a demotivation poster that sums it up: http://www.despair.com/meetings.html

Posted by: ech on June 20, 2005 8:37 AM

Comments are Closed.