September 2, 2006

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Sock it to me

Wow. Lee Siegel got busted for sock puppetry. How do you spend this much time on the web and not know that sock puppetry is dangerous to your career?

I don't even understand why people bother--if your arguments are good, why not take credit for them. I actually did sock puppet once, long ago on this blog when it was Live from the WTC, but I wasn't defending myself; I was making fun of me. (I thought of a funny rejoinder to something I'd said which obviously wouldn't be that funny if I was saying it.) I don't remember what the post was, and the comments from that blog are long gone, but even at the time, I remember thinking that this was kind of stupid and juvenile. And I was a brand new blogger in my twenties, not an established media personality. Needless to say, after John Lott, I knew I'd never do that again. What on earth got into Siegel?

Posted by Jane Galt at September 2, 2006 4:00 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

Ah - and under the name "sprezzatura". Well I remember one of the most offensively poor essays I ever read, with the line "That's sprezzatura, baby"...

Posted by: The Philosophical Cowboy on September 2, 2006 4:57 PM

How can you spend this much time on the web and still be stupid enough to get caught?

Posted by: Ryan on September 2, 2006 10:43 PM

What I really want to know is: how can somebody be stupid enough to get caught? Just email your sock puppetry comments to a really good friend, someone you can trust with absolute certainty, and have that person post the comments. How hard can it be?

Posted by: Rudy on September 3, 2006 12:46 PM

Well that friend might have a big mouth...even the reliable ones do. If you really MUST do it, just go to the public library.

Posted by: alan on September 3, 2006 2:22 PM


Jane Galt is the most insightful commentator known to me. Her daringly muscular prose leaves onlookers wishing they had the sheer style to attempt her gyrations of intellect. Where she has detractors, they are merely jealous pygmies, twisted with hatred in their tiny hearts for the grand and beautiful cathedrals of prosodic reason that Jane Galt erects.
...

Sprezzatura is currently unemployed and will sockpuppet for food. I'm sorry the Lee Siegel thing backfired but I will advance your cause given suitable cues on how you would like to praised in your blog comments section.

Posted by: Sprezzatura on September 3, 2006 3:14 PM

Here's a sample of my work for Siegel - hard hitting, no?

...

I'm a huge fan of Siegel, been reading him since he started writing for TNR almost ten years ago. (Full disclosure: I'm an editor at a magazine in NYC and he's written for me too.) I watch the goings-on and have to scratch my head. The people who hate him the most are all in their twenties and early thirties. There's this awful suck-up named Ezra Klein--his "writing" is sweaty with panting obsequious ambition--who keeps distorting everything Siegel writes--the only way this no-talent can get him. And I ask myself: why is it the young guys who go after Siegel? Must be because he writes the way young guys should be writing: angry, independent, not afraid of offending powerful people. They on the other hand write like aging careerists: timid, ingratiating, careful not to offend people who are powerful. They hate him because they want to write like him but can't. Maybe if they'd let themselves go and write truthfully, they'd get Leon Wieseltier to notice them too.

-- Sprezzatura

Posted by: Sprezzatura on September 3, 2006 3:23 PM

Maybe people take up sock-puppetry because it pays well...

Posted by: ellipsis on September 3, 2006 3:41 PM

Oh, sock puppets have been around as long as socks. Marcel Proust, Henry Adams, Jonathan Swift, among other heavys, all wrote things about themselves or their works that were published under assumed names or the names of friends. Really, tis true.

Posted by: big al on September 3, 2006 4:58 PM

Sock puppetry may have its uses, but if the sock puppet(s) begin complementing or defending each other, it's going to be painfully obvious that a con game is in progress.

Posted by: anony-mouse on September 3, 2006 5:51 PM

Great point, anony-mouse!

Posted by: amony-nouse on September 3, 2006 5:51 PM

Big Al wrote:

Oh, sock puppets have been around as long as socks.

How long is that, then?

Posted by: ellipsis on September 3, 2006 11:51 PM


Good one, Ellipsis! You go get'em, anony-mouse!

Posted by: Lee Siegal on September 3, 2006 11:52 PM


Hey, stop sock-puppeting me, Lee Siegal!

Posted by: Lee Seegel on September 3, 2006 11:53 PM


What are you lot on about, then, and why aren't ther e any good videos anymore?

Posted by: Lee Flock Of Seagulls on September 4, 2006 12:10 AM

Oh my - I just heard about a case of ALEXANDER HAMILTON sock puppetry in the Chernow biography (my current dog walking listen). He was writing pseudonymously about the Jay treaty with England and pseudonymously sock-puppeted a commentary about how brilliant his other pseudonym was! Indeed, I think the pseudonyms were as transparent as Camillus and Philocamillus (though that might have been for a different batch of pamphleteering).

Posted by: Michael Tinkler on September 4, 2006 12:27 PM

Three Words and Scifi reference: Locke and Demosthenes

Posted by: Neal on September 4, 2006 2:07 PM


Hamiltonians, here in LaPorte?

Posted by: Win Bear on September 4, 2006 3:19 PM


We at Sprezzatura Inc. are investigating new ways to avoid sock-puppetry blowing up in ones face (or on one's feet, ha ha.)

One option we're investigating is posting the sock-puppeted contributions under a name which (to any smart reasonable person) would be an obvious pseudonym for the person involved.

Thus, comments from Lee Siegel would be posted by Le Geisel. Etc. If these pseudonyms were too obvious, we could offer rot-13 or 128-bit cryptography. Thus, if someone busted "Yrr Fvrtry" or "10FA55C87D0" for sock-puppetry, we could point out that it was an obvious pseudonym for "Lee Siegel", chosen only to be witty!

We believe that sock-puppet social-engineering is still in its infancy, and deplore the prevalent mocking attitude toward our work.

Posted by: Sprezzatura on September 4, 2006 9:16 PM

What on Earth? Did the former Scrapplefacers and now Villianous Company Companions start in on Megan's blog?

Very funny, guys and gals.

Posted by: Rex on September 5, 2006 2:25 PM


How can all you people clown around like this when there are millions of people dying of AIDS in Africa?

Posted by: Kevin Drum on September 5, 2006 6:08 PM


Hey, Kevin, how about reviewing my book nicely? There's no need to read it, mind you, I don't bother to read the books that I review, especially the ones by Christianists.

Posted by: Andrew Sullivan on September 8, 2006 10:30 AM

wrhmfaicg jflodew dtpvbn hzxackb klec dktnoj fxzh

Posted by: sxqntf djow on September 9, 2006 9:38 AM

lceup lgxaqnrz mqsbayr sqvldhbnu ezls ljdgpcrh vnufhi http://www.lgfyepmv.aljvckixf.com

Posted by: qmhpxruaj qtycesv on September 9, 2006 9:39 AM

amwxetgoz irecqnlbg qdvu fwoalevh pkhewusg sjor ezig bxypdwgkr hswc

Posted by: iaknd cdgjemwlz on September 9, 2006 9:39 AM
Post a comment