March 19, 2007

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Public Appearance Alert

I'll be skulking around the New School tomorrow evening, appearing on a panel on risk. If you're in New York City, please come on down.

Posted by Jane Galt at March 19, 2007 8:42 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

Don't forget to tape "House, M.D." (Is tape still the appropriate term?)

Posted by: D------ on March 19, 2007 10:53 PM

Nah, in Jane's world you Tivo something. No tape involved.

Posted by: anony-mouse on March 20, 2007 12:52 AM

What an interesting subject, it is something that I have been thinking a lot about myself. Fear of terrorism has taken us overboard, like into Iraq mistakenly, yet fear that our kids won't have good schools have taken us away from experimenting with vouchers and left us with mediocre schools for forty years now.

My thought is that irrational levels of fear afflicts both sides of our politics. Around where I live safety is always such a huge issue about everything.

The problems with irrational fear is that it stymies creativity, clear thinking, and seeks to avoid any error and all you end up with is error.

Posted by: Michael H. on March 20, 2007 3:04 AM

I think fear seems to stimulate all kinds of creativity, like the thought that going into Iraq was irrational or mistaken. And vouchers are just about teacher unions and not beaurocracy.

And a little fear focusses and clarifies thinking.

What brought this though on anyway? Sounds like paranoia.

Posted by: aaron on March 20, 2007 6:50 AM

Just read your paper. Thanks, I needed a good laugh.

/boo!

Mike Lawson

Posted by: mr lawson on March 20, 2007 4:12 PM

I wish I was in New York to see it.

Posted by: PoliticalCritic on March 20, 2007 8:45 PM

Jane,

Read your paper. Not bad. While I doubtlessly have a bias on the matter, yours spanks Hayes'. The only quibble I'll make with you, is in the area of catastrophic risk. Specifically, its fairly common to have distributions with extremely low probability outcomes with catastrophic outcomes. In this case, even where strict cost benefit analysis would argue against fear it makes sense to consider the risk tangible. That said, good piece.

Posted by: Bill Dalasio on March 21, 2007 1:07 PM
Post a comment