April 14, 2007

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Comment of the day

From commenter Zach:

I also enjoyed the longer version of _Stranger in a Strange Land._ At the same time, Heinlein is the last author who should be put forward as a case against editors. It's startling how much better the heavily constrained and edited childrens' books and short stories hold up on rereading than the stuff he wrote later in his career.

A good editor was needed to take Heinlein firmly by the hand -- wearing sterile gloves if necessary -- and insist that no more than 1/4 of the possible male-female sexual pairings be explored in any given novel.

Posted by Jane Galt at April 14, 2007 10:08 AM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

When the "unedited versions" of some of Heinlein's works came out posthumously, I did close-reading comparisons of a few of them. In each book, I found one substantive scene that had been cut in the 'edited' version, and was a bit of a loss. But what I found far more of was that the edited version said the exact same thing as the unedited version, only with about 30% fewer words. Just on a sentence-by-sentence level, Heinlein without an editor is much wordier than he needs to be.

Posted by: Alexx Kay on April 14, 2007 3:31 PM

Hmmmm... Remind me to see about picking up an unedited copy of The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress one of these days. Partly to see if the libertarian-based governmental concepts Heinlein introduced in the text were vastly altered in the final printing, but partly to see if the (cough) interpersonal relationships wound up being toned down as well.

Posted by: Off Colfax on April 14, 2007 3:55 PM

My best Heinlein story--after having read a dozen or so Heinlein novels, I was thumbing through Number of the Beast (now my favorite RAH book aside from Job) in a used bookstore. I flipped through two thirds of the book before any references to time traveling incest occurred, so I decided to buy it.

Posted by: John Bragg on April 14, 2007 11:15 PM

To each their own, I suppose. The rampant sex didn't really bother me and I enjoyed the post jealousy society that he'd created. From a strictly editorial standpoint, I thought that the longer versions had more flavor.

Posted by: Peder on April 15, 2007 10:03 AM

Erm, 1/4? MM, FF, and MF are 3; dare I ask what the 4th is? Or do I just need to read more Heinlein?

Posted by: asg on April 15, 2007 8:26 PM

April:

I don't think the comment was referring to "generic" pairing, but instead referred to specific pairing, such as Lazarus with W, X, Y, or Z. From Lazarus and W, we can extrapolate X, Y and Z with pretty good accuracy.

Posted by: Lumps on April 16, 2007 10:23 AM

It's startling how much better the heavily constrained and edited childrens' books and short stories hold up on rereading than the stuff he wrote later in his career.

From what is in his letters collection, Grumbles From the Grave, the children's novels had relatively minor edits that he did himself when he got the editor's inputs. (Only one book had a major plot change in it and is now available "unedited". And knowing Heinlein, I figured out at the time what the original ending must have been from other clues in the surrouinding text.) Length didn't seem to be a problem.

The short story edits were all over the map, due to the varying editorial constraints. Most of the edits in Stranger were to cut to length - I did a side-by-side reading of about 10% of the book and found the changes essentially a NOOP. Only one minor plot point was changed.

Hmmmm... Remind me to see about picking up an unedited copy of The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress one of these days.

Don't think there is one. Only a handful of the uncut works have come out - about 4 or 5 novels (SiaSL, Red Planet, Podkayne of Mars, and Puppet Masters, IIRC) and a couple of short stories.

However, Jane's larger point about the value of editors remains. Prime example: Tom Clancy.

Posted by: ech on April 16, 2007 1:40 PM

In the un-edited Red Planet, Lazurus Long (under one of his masquerade names) steps forward at a moment of crisis to save the Martian revolution and then fades back into the role of a minor character. I suppose it was too confusing a plot twist for the editors.

Posted by: Laney on April 17, 2007 11:07 AM

I've been reading Heinlein stuff lately, and I find huge variation in quality. Starship Troopers and Moon Mistress are excellent, but so much of his stuff is well-written crap. Sounds contradictory, but there it is.

Posted by: Rick on April 17, 2007 11:36 AM

rovtlnf tpdfebkg uyvpzc nmizwb kpqilv enfig cazluq

Posted by: mgkpouqn oscyxuz on April 17, 2007 5:11 PM

kvenoqb jlmsow kslyve cgpt kxhczai pjzuklxwg vrldkzue http://www.huptnx.krbelt.com

Posted by: bqudhf ysrx on April 17, 2007 5:12 PM

vdmsxby epcqajkv ricf mngciw ewcqu wpbjingt pqry ubzhw rnykjfuo

Posted by: bvrtldq ozrmcsb on April 17, 2007 5:13 PM
Post a comment