April 30, 2007

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Note to self

Do not wear slightly ridiculous, yet nonetheless beloved, Abercrombie and Fitch miniskirt near Alex, nor permit him to see pictures of same.

Posted by Jane Galt at April 30, 2007 10:13 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>
Comments

This thread is useless without pictures

Posted by: grrgle on April 30, 2007 10:35 PM

Pictures? Did I hear pictures?

Posted by: 72 km/h on April 30, 2007 10:39 PM

/taps foot impatiently

Posted by: JAB on May 1, 2007 1:25 AM

The real test is the smile. If Alex is getting a warm and welcome smile, and only pays attention to the skirt, well, we can now write off trying to contact Alex' non-existent character.

If there isn't a smile, Alex' attention belongs elsewhere anyway.

Just a thought ..

Posted by: Brad K. on May 1, 2007 2:26 AM

Reminds me of the old Garry Shandling gag about how clothes should come with expiration dates so people know when they're out of fashion.

Posted by: Larry on May 1, 2007 3:56 AM

Somebody remembers a Garry Shandling gag?

Posted by: Gil Roth on May 1, 2007 7:00 AM

A man notes not the woman, he is yet redeemable. A man notes not her body, he's hopeless.

Posted by: Alan Kellogg on May 1, 2007 7:02 AM

Alan, do you have an attribution for that?

Posted by: Peter on May 1, 2007 12:45 PM

It's not the miniskirt (or shorts), but the legs behind it.

Posted by: D------ on May 1, 2007 12:50 PM

Wisely, Alex has added the following to his post:

UPDATE: Clearly this otherwise sound principle does not apply to you, Megan.

I concur.

Posted by: Not that jim on May 1, 2007 10:39 PM

No one exceeds the evil cruelty of a tease.

Posted by: Brett on May 4, 2007 1:07 PM
Post a comment