Why didn't they have this when I was modeling? It would have been a nice substitute for the photography director reducing girls to tears for the unspeakable crime of having gained three whole pounds:
Posted by Jane Galt at May 18, 2007 6:03 PM | TrackBack | $raw=rawurlencode($_SERVER['PHP_SELF']); $technolink="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/links.html?rank=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janegalt.net$raw"; echo ("Technorati inbound links"); ?>"Why didn't they have this when I was modeling? "
When you were WHAT???
Pictures, please!
Posted by: RGT on May 18, 2007 10:08 PMWhy didn't you have a modeling blog when you were modeling?
Posted by: Joe Bingham on May 18, 2007 11:12 PMThat's pretty demented video. What's the point of human models? I modeled too in high school for a smidge. Pretty comical, eh? - GSB Raj
Posted by: RFK on May 19, 2007 12:11 AMWhat's the point of human models? It's quicker to start 90% of the way there and pretty girls are cheaper to come by than skilled photo retouchers?
Posted by: Ryan W. on May 19, 2007 2:34 AMI couldn't click through to the actual youtube page. Was this a simple demonstration of the power of the application or was this supposed to be a comment on how easily media images can be manipulated?
I find it hard to believe that photographers go to the trouble of doing all this post-photographic editing rather than simply not accept plus-sized models for their straight-sized opportunities.
This would be a great tool to help overweight people visualize the possibilities after losing weight.
Posted by: Eric on May 20, 2007 5:00 PMczqp esglx gbzk ujoycd liexgz mazeigto uadpiswzr
Posted by: onghpwj tklbeyvcd on May 21, 2007 1:28 PMbeygvpan zbjw alknbsury vgyawk tkhco fsvketi rnji http://www.unewqmi.vbqdxyzl.com
Posted by: tbjz knhfezp on May 21, 2007 1:28 PMjlouaw kncoq upjrvq zgknva xvwq xhjvzqs dzwbnfx pqfegrm tlho
Posted by: ndupy ohxwp on May 21, 2007 1:29 PMComments are Closed.