June 15, 2007

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

All about me

Normblog has a profile up.

Posted by Jane Galt at June 15, 2007 9:36 AM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links
Comments
Posted by: laura on June 15, 2007 11:16 AM

Good job. I answered his questions after a couple of beers, and I was incomprehensible and rude. When asked "What would you do with the UN?", I think I answered "redecorate."

Posted by: Klug on June 15, 2007 11:37 AM

Yes, but wouldn't you rather be invisible?

Posted by: jim` on June 15, 2007 12:01 PM

Richard Powers' work is awesome! Truly, one of the underapperciated geniuses of 20th century literature.

I should scamper over to Amazon and see if he has anything new.

Posted by: Kate on June 15, 2007 12:20 PM

I've always thought Julia Stiles looked like you and I would have cast her to play you in the movie.

Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan on June 15, 2007 1:00 PM

I don't know how tall she is, but she's about the right age, has long dark hair, and is a genuine intellectual with a book on math about to be published: Winnie Cooper.

Posted by: D on June 15, 2007 1:12 PM

it's nice to read about you like this. Since the odds are astoundingly low that we would ever meet, the chance to see what goes on in your brain behind the scenes is refreshing...

"What is the best novel you've ever read? > It's a toss-up between Anna Karenina and Heart of Darkness. I can't imagine what that says about me, but something awful, I'm sure."

I almost split my side laughing at that...

D

Posted by: Grandpa Brian on June 15, 2007 1:15 PM

Thank you. I've followed your blog for quite some time and find myself quoting you quite often.

Posted by: Klug on June 15, 2007 1:29 PM

IMHO, Danica McKellar and Julia Stiles look more alike one another than Jane.

Posted by: Disgusted Beyond Belief on June 15, 2007 1:39 PM

Interesting interview. I don't think you look that much like Ally Sheedy, though I can see why some would say there is a resemblance. But she can't play you in a movie - she's too much older than you are now. Usually if there's a movie about someone's life, you have an actor younger than you play you, than if for no other reason than you can't do a movie about what you'll do in the future, only the past if it is biographical.

Something else I keep meaning to ask - as a libertarian, what you think about such things as the crap we see from pundits like 'the tax cuts pay for themselves' (which I blogged about myself today) and the shopkeepers (broken window) paradox (which I blogged about a few months ago).

Posted by: bandit on June 15, 2007 1:51 PM

Only an occassional reader and commenter but now knowing that you're a Yankee fan I must hurl.

Posted by: david foster on June 15, 2007 3:33 PM

"More than almost anything, I'd like to be able to fly"...since growing your own wings is probably unlikely--ever think about learning to fly airplanes?


Posted by: Njorl on June 15, 2007 4:27 PM

"I don't know how tall she is, but she's about the right age, has long dark hair, and is a genuine intellectual with a book on math about to be published: Winnie Cooper."

She also is one of the few people with an Erdoz-Bacon number!

Posted by: dearieme on June 15, 2007 6:54 PM

"The Plague by Camus (in English)": cissie!
By the by, if you like gloomy novels do try the greatest novel in English - James Hogg's The Confessions of a Justified Sinner.

Posted by: Hans Moleman on June 15, 2007 6:55 PM

I've always thought you looked like Jacinda Barrett.

Posted by: D------- on June 16, 2007 12:38 AM

Ah, the Yankees.

Remember 1978!

Posted by: D------ on June 16, 2007 12:48 AM

You should read Kenneth Waltz's Adelphi Paper, "Nuclear Weapons: Is More Better," which was published in 1981 by the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

It's not on-line, but you can get it here, http://www.iiss.org/index.asp?pgid=9387

Nuclear proliferation may actually be beneficial and help keep the peace.

Posted by: D------ on June 16, 2007 12:51 AM

Actually Waltz's paper is on-line. I goofed. (Another paper that cites it gets it title wrong.) See http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/waltz1.htm

Posted by: Rand Simberg on June 16, 2007 12:42 PM

I think it's possible to acquire a large amount of money without ruining your life, as long as you know what you'd do with it. I think it's a matter of having a purpose to your life, and being able to apply resources to it, at whatever level you have them.

Most of the people whose lives are ruined by money, I suspect, weren't really sure why they were living in the first place, other than to engage in pleasurable activities. They probably work to live, rather than the other way around.

I'm quite confident I could handle it. I'd buy a house where I wanted to live (a nice one, but not a ridiculously extravagant one) and invest it in all sorts of space ventures.

Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan on June 16, 2007 2:06 PM

'She also is one of the few people with an Erdoz-Bacon number!'

Which makes perfect sense for someone who's both a published mathemetician and an actress.

Posted by: triticale on June 16, 2007 4:47 PM

"Nuclear Weapons Is More Better" sounds like something a lolcat would say.

Posted by: New West Living on June 16, 2007 8:54 PM

"having voted for Bush in 2004, I'm unwilling to trust my judgement again."

NO FREAKING KIDDING! What a moron!

Posted by: Stevie on June 16, 2007 10:44 PM

Calling flying an airplane flying is like calling riding a boat swimming....

If you want to learn to fly, take up skydiving. People might think it's falling, but, trust me, you learn to fly.

Posted by: doug on June 18, 2007 3:49 PM

so.. who is Jane Galt? (inspired relation to John?)

Comments are Closed.