July 19, 2007
From the desk of Jane Galt:IT seems I've missed my window to be nominated for "Hottest Media Type in DC." Because I know that y'all would have voted for me, right?
Update: It seems I may not have missed the window after all. And . . . well, all I'm saying is that if you don't nominate me, I'll cry, that's all. And maybe take a handful of ambien and who really cares because it's just another dead, ugly, Washington-DC based journalist, right?
Posted by Jane Galt at July 19, 2007 9:31 AM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links"); ?>Hottest? as in, "The temperature is rising in Washington. D.C., and yes, the warm air from the south is moving into the area, but the real reason is that phenomenal journalist working for The Economist, that sylph-like siren of the keyboard, the Red Carpet quality representative of the honourable British press...Megan M...!!"
Could be, but then again, what does she look like (pardon for being fairly gnu here...just a beest).
Posted by: falkoyn on July 19, 2007 9:56 AMPhysical hotness, or (far more important) intellectual hotness?
You're in the running for the first, but run the table in the second.
Posted by: Peter VE on July 19, 2007 1:58 PMIs Ana Marie Cox still considered a "DC Media Type"?
-just asking, that's all...I mean, I know she stopped doing Wonkette a long time ago...still...
Wha? What? Where was I? I'm kidding. Really, I'm kidding. Of course I'm voting for you! What red blooded American male is going to vote for some dirty talking bimbo?
I, personally, am much more interested in knowing your thoughts on if the markets are undermining central banks or not.
Posted by: Reagan Fan on July 19, 2007 3:35 PMThe linked post says that we must supply them with pictures of the nominee. Accordingly, if you want us to nominate you for the title of "Hottest DC Media Type", we're going to need some pictures of you looking hot.
Posted by: A.S. on July 19, 2007 4:30 PMSo give us a linkable picture we can use to nominate you, already...
Posted by: TW Andrews on July 19, 2007 4:39 PMTry this...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Megan_McArdle_4_by_David_Shankbone.jpg
(sorry- my "html-fu" skills are teh suck)
Posted by: Reagan Fan on July 19, 2007 4:53 PMah, Reagan Fan, I AM dissappointed... perhaps I can improve your choices with a smiling picture of the hot one... though I dunno from the other schleps in the pic...
Dunno what tags this software takes sooooo...
ETA heh, figured it out
and so we come right back to the question...
when are we going to see a pic with her worshipfullness in something slinky with the 'men will die for me' look? :devil:
D
ps. kudos for Mr. David Shankbone for taking the shot in the first place... we bow to you ;)
I think the fabled "modeling" shots are required for this discussion.
Posted by: Joe R. on July 19, 2007 10:40 PMCan you take enough ambien to do that? I think you'd probably just crap your bed.
Posted by: aaron on July 20, 2007 8:02 AM