August 3, 2007

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

No, I have not been sacked

Getting sacked is not festive. And my last post specifically mentioned that there would be festivities.

But thanks to everyone who emailed for their concern. I love you all.

Posted by Jane Galt at August 3, 2007 3:05 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links
Comments
Posted by: Kate on August 3, 2007 3:47 PM

Depends on where you get sacked from. I know at least one person who was just WAITING to get fired. Finally did, had a party.

Posted by: Steve French on August 3, 2007 4:01 PM

It also depends on how you get sacked. Getting fired in a hail of shouting, legal threats and previously repressed opinions means you leave a legacy that will live on far longer than your time there...

Posted by: Richard Bennett on August 3, 2007 4:24 PM

Getting sacked with a nice severance package is pretty sweet, and often a cause for festivities.

Anyhow, if you're not working for those foreigners any more you don't have to use words like "sacked" where "fired" will do. We did, after all, dump their tea in that harbor (note spelling.)

Posted by: D on August 3, 2007 5:12 PM

'moved on to better things', has much the nice ring to it, no? Congratulations on your liberation. Care to share what your next move after work-decompression is?

Posted by: Kate on August 3, 2007 5:37 PM

And, if she's not working for the dern ferigners any more then will she stop spelling "color" with a "U"?

Posted by: Bill Dalasio on August 3, 2007 8:07 PM

Well, congratulations, whatever it is...

Posted by: David Walser on August 3, 2007 11:35 PM

Maybe she's marrying one of those dern ferigners, so she'd sticking with the spelling that uses all those extra letters. Although, given her status as an environmentalist, you'd think she'd think twice before wasting letters. Think of all the extra electrons she's burned over the years!

Posted by: Richard Bennett on August 4, 2007 5:06 AM

The lost productivity due to the extra letters is the main reason the filthy furriners haven't developed beyond socialism.

Posted by: Floyd on August 4, 2007 11:38 AM

I'm very sorry to hear this; The Economist clearly didn't know the value of the property they had on their hands. If I had a subscription, I'd cancel it.

Posted by: Rod on August 4, 2007 10:02 PM

I work in DC and would be happy to meet for coffee. Fair warning! I'm an government adjunct at George Mason University and will lobby you to be a guest speaker!

But, you 'll get a cuppa out of it.

Posted by: Floyd on August 5, 2007 2:09 PM

Oh, never mind, I just actually read the post correctly. I didn't parse through all the negatives the first time. Well, congratulations then.

Posted by: Contributor A on August 6, 2007 1:40 PM

So coy! So when are you going to tell your fans the good news?

Posted by: Joe Kristan on August 6, 2007 3:32 PM

Actually, the last time I was canned, a bunch of my co-workers came by my apartment after work and a party broke out. Looking back on it 22 years later, I realize that it really was something to celebrate, though it wasn't so clear at the time.

Posted by: Aristides on August 6, 2007 5:04 PM

Congratulations, good luck, have fun bumming around for a while, and we really look forward to hearing about your new gig.

Posted by: D------ on August 6, 2007 6:01 PM

The blogger "Fake Steve Jobs" has been outed.

Maybe a fake Jane Galt is spreading misinformation while the real Jane relaxes.

Posted by: Yancey Ward on August 7, 2007 3:30 PM

It is quite apparent that Megan has been cast in a major role for the first film installment of The Silmarillion- most likely as an elf.

Posted by: Crank on August 7, 2007 5:22 PM

Until Megan can confirm or deny, I can only but repeat what I read on the internets. And we know everything on the internets is true.

Posted by: Tim on August 10, 2007 8:01 PM

Crank, even if that is true it doesn't mean that she got fired. Leaving the Economist could be entirely voluntary.

Comments are Closed.