All of its evidence is anecdotal, but that's all right; I can enjoy anecdotal evidence even if I wouldn't want to use it to make policy. But there's too little even of this; the evidence offered to support the central thesis is thinner than Calista Flockhart on Slim Fast. The book certainly has its moments -- but they are widely interspersed between long plaints about how badly the network treated Bernie Goldberg, how much Bernie Goldberg was hurt by Dan Rather, how disgusted Bernie Goldberg is with modern newstrends . . . all bolstered mainly by inanely detailed recounting of petty incidents in the life of -- you guessed it -- Bernie Goldberg. I suspect this is why so many reviews have focused on the question of whether or not there is media bias -- there's just not enough meat in the book to write a good review on. Media accounts that have tried to dissect the facts in the book have ended up in the sort of exchanges
You did!Did not!
Did too!
That's because you're a big fat [liberal] [conservative] dooty-head!
That said, it's the sort of book you have to read, because everyone else is talking about it. It reminds me of The Bell Curve, which no one I know except me has read, but about which everyone I know -- except me -- has a strong opinion. Once you have read it, you'll find to your amusement that people make all sorts of wildly inflated or just downright odd assertions about it's contents, and it provides a glorious moment of superiority when you can trump someone's argument by cooly asking whether they've read the book. So go ahead: click the link and buy it. Then you can join the rest of us in wondering what all the fuss is about.
Posted by Jane Galt at March 16, 2002 02:00 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound linksComments are Closed.