I remember when that Mondo guy wrote about "the warbloggers" and challenged Glenn Reynolds to some sort of hit-measuring contest (mine bigger than yours..). I've now been linked by both (and the last instapundit link was ages ago - probably about 10K per day in Glenn's increasing traffic), and I can tell you for a fact that being linked by instapundit creates about 50 times the hits.
What does it all mean? I dunno. My own hits are puny compared to just about anyone, but I make enough new acquaintances to make this strange hobby fun for me - and I don't have to worry about bandwidth. Shoot, I did this for a month without a hit counter and didn't think anyone was looking. Then, all of a sudden, Matt Welch, whom I check in on regularly, mentioned me out of the blue, and I did some time as a "link-slut".
I might as well go on record on the "importance of blogs" issue here while I'm on the subject. Individually blogs are totally unimportant, this one in particular. Cumulatively, I think this is an interesting phenomenon that will begin to change the News Media and, perhaps, media in general. The bloggers I see represent the most avid consumers of news media, and blogging is a change in how they consume. It is a much more interactive way of consuming media. News media will see this change in their marketplace and begin to change how they deliver information - more hard information linked together in one place, more information that can be downloaded and inspected, the talkbacks and news "forums" you already see springing up on the sites of major newspapers. And, of course, we will see the occasional desperate aspiring pundit trolling furiously for whatever hits he/she can get, taking poorly-conceived potshots in the hopes that he/she can build that heretofore elusive audience by becoming the "anti-Sullivan", "antiKaus " or "anti-Postrel".
In sum:
Blogging as a news consumer phenomenon=will spur innovation in news media
Individual blogs like this = not much More Than Zero. Just "For the love of the game..."
UPDATE: Yup, still true. Maybe 75 times as many. Actually, I can only see 10 or so of the last 100 hits that aren't instapundit. Thank you, Glenn, for making MTZ drink from the hit-firehose one more time.
2nd Update: for a visual of the difference, remember the "Behind the Deadlines" link was Wednesday (2/6) morning and Instapundit Thursday (2/7) afternoon, now click here.
Posted by Mindles H. Dreck at February 6, 2002 08:54 PM | Technorati inbound linksCongratulations on a great potential tagline, from Mr. Mondo's essay: "But now I think I've finally got this elusive "dynamism" pinned down, for the essay Postrel links to is a perfect horror."
More than Zero: "A Perfect Horror" -- J. Raimondoo.
You've done well for yourself, Andreas.
Posted by: Richard Bennett on February 6, 2002 09:45 PMGreat stuff. My takes are here and here Enjoy!
Jay
(note from editor - I changed Jay's text URL's to links to avoid formatting glitches.)
Posted by: Jay Manifold on February 7, 2002 12:14 PMWhen Samizdata gets mentioned by Instapundit, we usually spike up from typically about 1000 visitors/1500 page views per day to about 3000+ visitors per days, gradually tailing off over two to three days. He is most certainly the hit factory and about 20-30% of our day to day traffic comes via his page even on normal days. The Uberblogger indeed!
Posted by: Perry de Havilland on February 7, 2002 10:10 PMOK, so what do I have to do to get myself mentioned or linked? Check us out--an American and a Spaniard, based in Barcelona, opining on everything but especially Spanish-American links at www.johnandantonio.com. Give us a try. We're a rather unusual blog--we translate articles from English to Spanish and vice versa, and we've instituted a regular running commentary, too.
--John Chappell
I suspect all you have to do to get an Instapundit reference is to post something particularly interesting. How you do that, of course, is the challenge, but that's what makes blogging fun.
BTW, 'Mindles', must you emphasize your blog is 'totally unimportant'? After all, where does that leave the rest of us?
Posted by: Andrew Olmsted on February 11, 2002 08:58 PMNo offense intended, 'Mindles'. I just think blogs are like a school of fish. They have some impact collectively , but not individually. "Totally unimportant" is perhaps a bad choice of words.
Posted by: "Mindles H. Dreck" on February 13, 2002 02:24 PMComments are Closed.