Very interesting article in Slate on the battle between directors and bowdlerizers. Looks like Mrs. Grundy has the law on her side.
Posted by Jane Galt at January 20, 2003 06:45 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound linksConsidering how much smarter you are than any liberal blogger I've seen, your site should be called "Asymmetrical Intelligence". Keep up the good work !
Posted by: Sri on January 20, 2003 07:26 PMSo why don't I ever get fanboi (actually, I'd prefer fangurl) gushing in my comments?
Posted by: Frankenstein on January 20, 2003 09:29 PMWell, as odd as it sounds, the bowdlerizers do have free speech on their side, don't they?
God bless America. :-)
Posted by: Dean Esmay on January 21, 2003 02:50 AMThis case is hugely important for digital media.
With physical good, the doctrine of first sale ensures that I can modify them (re-bind a book, annotate in the margins etc.) and re-sell them without having to contact the original author at all.
In the digital domain, this becomes problematic - as creating copies is now straightforward, there is no longer a scarcity defined by the physical good.
Hence (part of) my proposal over at http://mediagora.com - that this notion should be extended to the digital domain, such that I can distribute derivative works of an existing work, as long as my customers buy a copy of the source work too.
If I were to put some of this filtering software on a copy of "Meet John Doe" and run the DVD in reverse, would it be possible to strip off Gary Cooper's clothes and find out once and for all whether -- uh, well, you know.
Posted by: Leigh Hanlon on January 21, 2003 05:33 PMWhat if I didn't want to read an article in a newspaper. Could the writers and editors have the courts force me to read the newspaper in their prescribed order and completely. Does this pertain to books? What if I didn't really care to see Star Wars Episode I, but want to see Episode II?
I am so confused, I think I need the gubbmint (and/or Hollywood) to tell me how to live my life.
Posted by: fred on January 21, 2003 07:09 PMComments are Closed.