Looks like the first Enron prosecution to make it to trial may have just blown up courtesy of Andrew Fastow. Could it be a little well-timed revenge for the court's nixing his wife's plea agreement? Or were the prosecutors trying to pull a fast one? Enquiring minds want to know!
Posted by Jane Galt at June 3, 2004 02:41 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound linksThe fact that the presecutors are saying that they do not consider the evidence exculpatory, rather than that they just discovered it and the defense is getting it ASAP, strongly suggests the government was holding back. We shall see.
Posted by: Recovering Philadelphia Lawyer on June 3, 2004 04:26 PMWhen you walk down skid row with c-notes sticking out of all your pockets, you still have a right not to be mugged, but you sure are not showing good sense.
California almost insisted on being mugged by making it illegal for utilities to do anything to prepare for possible shortages of power.
Comments are Closed.