November 23, 2004

silhouette3.JPG From the desk of Jane Galt:

Deconstruct my discourse, darling!

Is there anything that Daniel Drezner can't do? Not satisfied with his triumphs in the areas of economics and political science, he has forayed into literature:

Diane had longed to bandwagon with Jack since their first year in grad school. In their own prisoner's dilemma, she now knew that she wanted more than just tit-for-tat -- she had to have Jack's grim trigger. This wasn't just a one-shot interaction for her. She wanted repeated play -- with very little discounting.

It was taboo as a realist not to prefer balancing. If word got out, her reputation among the guns & bombs crowd would be ruined. But Jack's social constructivism was too seductive for her feeble rationalist defenses.

"Oh... Jack," she whispered into his ear, "I give in -- reconstitute my identity!"

He smiled and slowly began his discourse....

Afterwards, she turned to him and purred, "Now that's what I call utility maximization." He laughed.

Then her tone changed. "Seriously, I've never had such a shared meaning with anyone before. It was so.... intersubjective."


Posted by Jane Galt at November 23, 2004 07:11 PM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound links
Comments

Kiss,Kiss - Bang,Bang - Ka Ching!

Posted by: Frank Martin on November 23, 2004 08:10 PM

That is so, so...hegamonic! It was truly sovereign and the language used to describe what took place just adds to the legitimacy of the act itself. ^_^

Posted by: Small Pink Mouse on November 24, 2004 12:11 AM

Ohh...that has me all hot and tingly, and I have no idea why.

Posted by: Mumblix grumph on November 24, 2004 01:06 AM

Ever so much is revealed in the misspelling "hegamonic."

Posted by: the woodshed on November 24, 2004 07:51 AM

You mean apart from the fact that into every life a typo or two must come?

"Sometimes, dear Woodshed, a cigar is just a cigar!" :P

Posted by: Small Pink Mouse on November 24, 2004 07:47 PM

Comments are Closed.