Does anyone remember the name of a humor book, probably over 20 years old by now, that was about a group of archaeologists from a future century stumbling upon a perfectly preserved motel, and the hilarious conclusions they drew about its contents?
Posted by Jane Galt at March 6, 2005 11:41 AM | TrackBack | Technorati inbound linkscheck:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040115/0948210.shtml
Posted by: bithead on March 7, 2005 12:51 PMI loved that book!
Our sixth grade history teacher read it aloud to us and it has stuck in my mind ever since. The only downside was - reading that book made me completely unable to take any archeologist or paleontologist very seriously. Because no matter what they say - they are only guessing.
Posted by: liberty on March 7, 2005 12:54 PMThis is a really cool demonstration of the power of collective knowledge. Just an interesting anecdote demonstrating the power of the blogosphere.
Posted by: Dave on March 7, 2005 12:56 PMWonderful! I've always wondered the same thing. When I was a little kid, I read an excerpt from that book (I believe) in a Reader's Digest at my grandparents' house. I remember it being a hilarious parody of a future archaeologist uncovering a toilet, and theorizing about how the ancients (20th cent. Americans) worshipped it. That's got to be the same book, right? But I never could remember who wrote that.
Posted by: Stuart Buck on March 7, 2005 02:01 PMI'm still trying to recall a story I read 35+ years ago about an inventor whose best inventions were conceived when he was on a bender, forgets what their function is, then has to figure out what they are supposed to do when he sobers up.
I think the guy's name was Gallagher? Hey, I don't claim that it was great literature but it did help ease me down the path to a lifelong love of reading.
Posted by: Joe Bagadonuts on March 7, 2005 03:36 PMhttp://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0395284252/ref=ase_techdirtcom/102-9164038-6410519?v=glance&s=books
Posted by: BobD on March 7, 2005 03:53 PMMr Buck -
I do believe you are thinking of a short story /
tale / thingy called "Toilet Ritual Among the
Naciroma". Probably closer to 40 years old now
than 20.
A couple of follow up thoughts:
1) I happened to be able to find this because I remembered the joke name the author gave to the love-shack motel: The "Toot 'N' C'mon." That was enough for G__gle.
2) AI's comment spam filter chokes on my detroit.freenet.org address and the word "G__gle" (referring to a popular web search tool).
Posted by: alkali on March 7, 2005 04:33 PMMike, I think that was "Body Ritual Among the Nacirema" (note the clever backward spelling!), from the _Worm Runners Digest_ and reprinted in one of the Year's Best SF collections in the 60s. The Gallegher stories were by Henry Kuttner writing as "Lewis Padgett"; one of them that I remember is "The Proud Robot."
Posted by: Jake Smith on March 7, 2005 04:36 PMMr Smith,
Two errors in five words ... I'm getting dyslexic in my old age! Thanks for the
corrections.
Are you talking about this essay? That's a funny essay, but definitely not what I read in Reader's Digest in the mid-1980s.
Posted by: Stuart Buck on March 7, 2005 06:22 PMIt's Motel of the Mysteries by David Macaulay, and it's still in print!. The Amazon link even has page images for your reminiscing-b efore-buying pleasure.
Posted by: Different River on March 8, 2005 02:43 AMInterestingly enough, Macauley's book is required reading in the Winterthur Fellowship. As a result, my wife owns it.
Posted by: "Mindles H. Dreck" on March 8, 2005 08:11 AMI've heard that MIT uses Macaulay's _The Way Things Work_ as a introductory engineering text.
Posted by: John on March 8, 2005 11:23 AMJoe, you have your inventor's name right. The story you're thinking of is one of a series written in the 1940s by SF legend Henry Kuttner. "The Proud Robot" is one of the best-known of them. They've been collected in a book with that title, alternately issued as "Robots Have No Tails."
Posted by: Derek Lowe on March 8, 2005 11:24 AMHere's a second huzzah for MaCaulay's The Way Things Work. I got my own hardcover copy at reduced cost back in the fifth grade and subsequently wore the thing down to a stub (okay, not quite). The best part is that the cutaway illustrations of the devices he describes are invariably skyscraper-sized cathedrals being constructed by miniature people running around on the page (with a good many wooly mammoths -- no, don't ask, just pick up a copy from your local library). If you look around at what they're actually doing, there's a good bit of subtle humor at play (and sometimes even an ocassional subplot). If you have an aspiring technician or engineer in the family, buy them this book! [/plug]
Posted by: anony-mouse on March 8, 2005 03:54 PMThe "Nacirema" that some commenters have referred to is something separate from the Motel of the Mysteries.
It was a section of The People's Almanac, written and assembled in the mid-70's by Irving Wallace and David Wallechinsky. The article "Studying the Strange People of Nacirema" is on page 1085 of the paperback edition; I'm looking at it right now. For those who may look it up, I won't give away the origin of the country's name.
Posted by: Jay on March 8, 2005 10:32 PMWeird pricing at Amazon; can someone explain it?
The comments above prompted me to buy the book. I went to Amazon and found it for sale for $10.40. I did not buy it immediately.
15 minutes later I returned to Amazon and found a listing for "Motel of the Mysteries [BARGAIN PRICE]" for $4.99. Why the sudden (and apparently not replicable) drop in price? Note that the bargain version is the same book, new, direct from Amazon and available for "FREE Super Saver Shipping." I happily bought the book at the reduced price.
Can anyone explain the pricing?
Posted by: David M on March 9, 2005 02:15 PMDaivd M.
Though I can't prove it I believe that Amazon uses a "fare yield" strategy similar to that the airlines use.
I know that in searching for pricing on tickets from Delta that on the initial query the price was high and every time I checked, several times over a short period of time (minutes), that the price kept getting higher. Now, again I can't prove for certain that my inquiries were causing the fare system to increase the quoted fares, but I have my suspicions.
Posted by: Joe Bagadonuts on March 12, 2005 04:29 PMI can also highly recommend Macaulay's other books - among them are Castle, Cathedral, Skyscraper and more. Castle and Cathedral describe how those things were built. Skyscraper does the same, but backwards - the skyscraper is being disassembled, if I remember correctly. Another detail I remember from one of his books (Although I don't remember which book) is L'Arc de Defeat. It's L'Arc de Triomphe, built upside down.
Posted by: Roger Ritter on March 12, 2005 04:51 PM >Another detail I remember from one of his books
> (Although I don't remember which book) is L'Arc
> de Defeat. It's L'Arc de Triomphe, built upside
> down
That's "Great Moments in Architecture" Which also shows "The Secret of the Pyramids Revealed." Wherein an excavated pyramid shows a giant razor blade.
Posted by: Frank ODonnell on March 12, 2005 11:46 PMThere was also "Digging the Weans" by Robert Nathan, an essay satirical of archeology that appeared in "A Stress Analysis of a Strapless Evening Gown and other essays for a scientific age." by Robert A. Baker (ed.), Prentice-Hall, 1963.
The acknowledgments say it was reprinted from "The Weans" Alfred A. Knopf (1961).
BTW, "Weans" comes from "USA" when "US" is interpreted by the future archeologists as "We," hence the title.
Posted by: Fred Crary on March 13, 2005 10:43 PM"Sanitized for your protection."
I can never read that little assurance without hearing it chanted in deep, sonorous tones in my head. The Motel should be read as a cautionary tale by every aspiring archaeologist, along with Bluffing your way in Archaeology by Paul Bahn. Bahn observes that archaeology is an ideal subject in which to become an accomplished bluffer, for several reasons including:
"3) It is especially easy in this field to pass yourself off as an expert, full of impressive and esoteric knowledge, because it is filled with obscure terms and exotic names and places. Even if the general public has heard of them, it is almost certain they will know little or nothing about them. Thus, a minimum of homework will go a very long way."
Sigh. For too many, that is too, too true.
Posted by: Swen on March 13, 2005 10:49 PMComments are Closed.